Matthew Brown represents Jordan Derrick in federal case tied to New Orleans investigation

By AI, Created 7:53 PM UTC, May 18, 2026, /AGP/ – Combs Waterkotte partner Matthew Brown is representing Jordan Derrick in pending federal criminal proceedings connected to an investigation stemming from the January 2025 New Orleans attack. The case is still in its early stages, and no guilt determination has been made.

Why it matters: - The federal case could test how online instructional materials are treated in an investigation tied to the January 2025 New Orleans attack. - Jordan Derrick remains entitled to the presumption of innocence while the case moves through federal court.

What happened: - Combs Waterkotte partner Matthew Brown has been retained to represent Jordan Derrick in pending federal criminal proceedings. - The case is identified as Case #4:26-mj-00063-JAM. - Federal charges have been filed in the United States District Court as part of an ongoing investigation related to online instructional materials. - The proceedings are connected to the broader federal investigation following the January 2025 attack in New Orleans. - The matter remains pending before the United States District Court.

The details: - Public court filings allege that online materials attributed to Derrick were accessed by the person accused in the New Orleans attack investigation. - Derrick has entered the federal criminal process. - No findings of guilt have been made. - Brown said the defense team will review the allegations, evidence and court filings through the normal course of the federal proceedings. - Brown said the matter will be addressed through the court system based on the evidence presented and the applicable law. - The defense said the public allegations and criminal complaints are part of an ongoing legal process. - The defense said the proceedings remain in the preliminary stages. - Brown confirmed that Derrick and his family have retained counsel. - The defense intends to respond to the allegations through the appropriate legal channels as the case moves forward.

Between the lines: - The filing signals an early-stage defense posture focused on process, evidence and constitutional protections rather than public rebuttal. - The case’s connection to the New Orleans investigation raises the stakes beyond a routine criminal proceeding.

What’s next: - The defense will likely begin its review of the government’s allegations and supporting filings. - The United States District Court will continue handling the case as the proceedings advance. - More factual development should come as the case moves past the preliminary stage.

The bottom line: - Derrick now has counsel in a pending federal case tied to a high-profile investigation, and the outcome will turn on the evidence presented in court.